|
Report of the African Social Forum Council
meeting
Perugia-Italy, 7-8 September 2005
As
urged by Peace Table organisers, the African Social
Forum Council held its meeting last 7-8 September
in
Perugia, Italy.
The
meeting’s objectives were to:
1-
Share information on the international process of
WSF;
2-
Exchange views on the build-up to the African Social
Forum, the Social Polycentric Forum of Bamako and
the World Social Forum of Nairobi 2007;
3-
Better draft the themes and methods of these different
processes, through the vision;
4-
Refine the functioning mode of the Council’s commissions;
5-
Finalize the nomination of those expected to join
the African Social Forum Council’s Facilitation
Group.
For
two days, the Commission on Communication and Mobilization,
the Content and Methodology Commission, the Resource
Commission and the Youth Commission convened on
several occasions.
1-
Information on the preparations for the process
of Social Forums in Africa
Representatives
of the committees of the different processes unveiled
the state of preparation. In all cases, the structuring
of the movement seemed to be heading in the right
direction with a strong involvement of the different
components of the civil society.
However,
the Council members raised some remarks in a bid
to:
-
Strengthen the inclusive
and democratic character of the different spaces
put in place;
-
Better articulate
the different processes among one another. Thus,
the idea of a caravan linking the Guinea Process
to the Bamako Process, and Morocco
to Mali, was agreed on;
-
Ensure a strong popular
participation;
-
Promote women’s participation
and boost their involvement in the forums;
-
Prop up youth participation.
Participants urged the youths on to take their responsibilities
for their mobilization and the construction of their
spaces ahead of Conakry,
Bamako and
Nairobi.
2- Elements of the vision developed by the
African Social Forum Council ahead of Bamako 2006
and Nairobi 2007: Africa Cradle of Humanity,
Grave of Capitalism
1- The Bamako Forum is a World Forum staged
in Africa
2- The Polycentric Forum is a stage towards
Nairobi 2007. It shall focus on the vision, the
themes and significant actions
3- The World Social Forum in Africa is expected to be an instrument
of social and political change, but not just a juxtaposition
of events. In this respect, there should be a prior-
and post-WSF in Africa
4- The Forum must be popular and highlight the
struggles and resistances waged on the continent
and worldwide
5- The Forum must be women-oriented and bolster
the promotion of women as an essential component
of society, their struggles, resistances and alternatives.
6- Culture must have a conspicuous place in
the life of the Forum, as an instrument of criticism
and socio-political reconstruction
7- The Forum must enable efforts at redefining
African unity on popular and diversity bases
8- The Forum must help decolonize the continent
by challenging international institutions, echoing
peoples’ voice towards recovering their sovereignty
on policies and resources. This will be possible
through a massive presence of social and popular
movements and a critical mass leading to a real
change
9- The Forum shall enable African movements
to work on the political and economic issue, given
that the bulk of Africans are not in a position
to express their hopes and concerns without risking
their life.
10- The Forum must endeavour to redefine the
concept of international solidarity. Solidarity
must not be limited to charity, but should seek
to establish consultation and exchanges on common
preoccupations for a better world.
11- The Forum must culminate in the definition
of popular and democratic alternatives likely to
form the bases of a collective commitment to change
the world.
3-
Working Commissions
The
Communication
and Mobilization, Content and Methodology, Resources
and Youth Commissions convened in two sessions.
They drafted a Plan of action expected to guide
the process until Nairobi 2007. The Communication
and Mobilization Commission also worked on a specific
Plan of action (see annex).
|
Work-plan / Plan d’action 2005-2007
|
|
Activities |
Objectives |
Events |
By Whom ? |
Ressource implication |
When ? |
|
Steering committee |
Facilitate
ASF work |
-
Conakry
-
Bamako
-
Nairobi |
ASF
council |
NIL |
9/9/05 |
|
Establishment
of commissions |
Facilitate
ASF work |
-
Conakry
-
Bamako
-
Nairobi |
ASF
council |
NIL |
9/9/05 |
|
Establishment
of national steering committees |
As
above |
As
above |
Social
movements of the ground |
NIL |
30/9/05 |
|
Budget
resource mapping |
Ressource modulation |
Conakry |
Guinea NIL,
commission, ASF |
Required
resources |
30/9/05 |
|
Budget resource
mapping |
Ressource modulation |
Bamako |
Mali national, commission, ASF + WSF + social movements |
Required
resources |
30/9/05 |
|
Budget resource
mapping |
Ressource modulation |
Nairobi |
Kenya national, commission, ASF + WSF + social movements |
As
needed |
30/11/05 |
|
ASF S.C inclusion
in WSF future deliberation |
Close
co-ordination of events |
-
Conakry
-
Bamako
-
Nairobi |
WSF
+ ASF |
As
needed |
30/9/05 |
|
IC meeting
in Bamako |
Prepare
for Africa polycentric |
Bamako |
WSF
+ ASF + Mali national
commission |
As
needed |
30/9/05 |
|
IC meeting
in Bamako |
Prepare
for all polycentric |
Bamako |
WSF
+ ASF + 3 polycentric committees |
As
needed |
Mid
October |
|
Thematic articulation
of the branding events |
Effective
information and mobilization |
-
Conakry
-
Bamako
-
Nairobi |
National
SF + ASF council + WSF council |
As
needed |
30/9/05
30/9/05
30/11/05 |
|
Joint fundraising
mission in Europe + Africa + America
+ Asia
+ others |
Ressource mobilization |
All
3 polycentric events |
National
committees + ASF + WSF |
As
needed |
Mid
September |
|
Meeting of
steering committee |
Follow
up of action plan |
-
Conakry
-
Bamako
-
Nairobi |
ASF |
As
needed |
??? |
|
Sub-regional
Social Forum meetings |
Mobilization
of social movements |
-
West Africa
-
East Africa
-
Maghreb |
National
committees + ASF + regional committees |
As
needed |
23-29/10/05 |
|
ASF |
Mobilization
of social movements |
Conakry |
National
committee + ASF |
As
needed |
1-5
December 05 |
|
Polycentric
Forum
|
Mobilization
of social movements |
Bamako |
National
Committee + ASF + WSF |
As
needed |
January
2006 |
|
Internet portal |
Information
exchange and booking |
Nairobi |
WSF
+ ASF |
As
needed |
June
2006 |
|
IC meeting |
To
inspect facilities |
Nairobi |
WSF
+ ASF |
As
needed |
March/April
2006 |
|
EASF Event |
Rehearsal
of 2007 WSF |
Nairobi |
Regional
Committee ASF |
As
needed |
June
2006 |
|
West Africa
Social Forum event |
Mobilization
of social movements |
Nigeria |
Regional
committee |
As
needed |
Oct./Nov.
06 |
|
Secondment
of personnel to Nairobi |
Strengthen
the host |
Nairobi
2007 |
EASF
+ ASF + WSF |
As
needed |
August
06 |
|
ASF Commission |
Stimulate
social movements |
Great Lake regions, central Africa, Madagascar |
ASFC
steering committee |
As
needed |
2006 |
|
Pre-meeting
of ASF + WSF |
Co-ordination
of events |
Nairobi |
ASF
+ WSF |
As
needed |
Jan.
2007 |
|
WSF 2007 |
World
social movement |
Nairobi |
WSF
+ ASF |
As
needed |
January
2007 |
4-
Nomination of Facilitation Group members
Following
the decisions of Harare, the Council has validated the nomination proposals made by the commissions.
The composition of the Facilitation Group is as
follows:
-
Polycentric Forum 2006: Aminata
Traoré
-
World Social Forum 2007: Professor Edward Oygui
and Fatma Aloo
-
African Social Forum Social 2005: Bakary
Fofana
-
Content and Methodology Commission: Demba
Moussa Dembélé
-
Communication and Mobilization Commission:
Coordinator Diana Senghor,
-
Communication: Thomas Deve,
Mobilization: Rabia Abdelkerim
Cheikh
-
Resources Commission: Mohau
Pheko
-
Youth Commission: Diakalia
Ouattara
-
Logistics Commission: Regis Mtutu
-
Northern Africa: Mohamed Said Saadi, Abdeljelil Bedoui, alternately
-
Ex officio: Taoufik Ben Abdallah, representing
the African Social Forum Secretariat
The
established group shall convene rapidly to define
its tasks and assume its facilitation role.
The
Council has also reaffirmed the role of the commissions
as defined in Harare: ensure the
effective execution of the tasks defined by the
Council ahead of the three Forums.
Beside,
the Council has recommended that the Youth Commission
should be backed by members of the Facilitation
Group in a bid to ensure the mobilization of all
the African sub-regions and the most dynamic youth
organizations.
5- Miscellaneous
5.1-
Joint ASF-Afro Brazilian Committee: the Facilitation
Grouped has been mandated to name members of this
committee. The establishment of this group was decided
during the Social Forum of 2005 in
Porto Alegre to define a common programme with Afro-Brazilian movements.
5.2-
Information on the Secretariat’s budget year 2004-2005:
the Secretariat unveiled the financial results of
the process:
-
Meeting of the African
Council, Cairo, July 2004
-
African Social Forum
of Zambia, December 2004
-
African participation
in the World Social Forum of Porto Alegre,
January/February 2005
-
Las Palmas meeting, March 2005
-
Harare meeting, June 2005
5.3- Strengthening of the secretariat: this issue was not discussed
due to a lack of time
Contacts
and meetings on the sidelines of the African Council
meeting
Several
meetings were held on the sidelines or in the aftermath
of the African Council meeting:
1-
Meeting with Italian movements: this meeting gathered
representatives of the movements involved in the
Peace Table as well as members of the African Council.
It outlined common work points in prospect of Bamako
2006 and Nairobi 2207. The
Italian movements pledged to back the process of
Social Forum in Africa in two ways: through a
resource support for Bamako and Nairobi and through a common Plan of action.
The
Plan of action, due to be drafted in the upcoming
weeks, shall cover important issues such as migrations,
free trade agreements and the place of local communities.
2-
Meeting on communication grouping members of the
International Council, members of the African Council
and delegates representing the Brazilian Secretariat.
This meeting was aimed at briefing the delegates
on the African Council’s Communication Plan and
the initiatives to be undertaken by different movements
during the African Process.
3-
Meeting among members of the Facilitation Committee
present in Perugia and members of the Brazilian Secretariat: the Secretariat gave information
on the Bamako meeting decided by the International Council of Barcelona. This meeting
was expected to group members of the Finance, Content
and Methodology, and Communication Commissions.
Eventually, it turned out to be a consultation meeting
between the Polycentric forums and members of the
International Council who made the trip to
Bamako. A report of the Bamako meeting will be issued shortly.
4-
Meeting on migrations: this meeting grouped African
members of the Council and representatives of Italian
movements. It was preceded by contacts on the same
issue with Spanish movements.
ANNEXE
1 : Rapport de la commission Communication
et mobilisation
|
ASF Council
Report of the Communication and Mobilisation Commission meeting
(Perugia, 8th September 2005)
|
I.
The participants
Cf.
list available at the Secretariat
II.
Agenda
1.
Communication and/or
Mobilisation: one or two commissions?
2.
Nomination of a representative
of the commission to the Steering Committee of the
ASF Council
3.
A Plan of Action
III.
Discussions
1.
Communication and Mobilisation: a single commission
The
plenary session held on 7.9.05 gave the “Communication
and mobilisation” commission the mandate to propose
to the Council the organization needed to could
carry out the double task of both communication
and mobilisation.
At
the Cairo meeting (July
2004), two different commissions on communication
and on mobilisation of Information had been set
up.
However,
the two commissions were somehow merged (halfway
between Cairo and
Perugia…). The deliberations of the C&M commission that met on 7.9.05
were mainly centred on Communication, much more
than on mobilisation.
The
question raised on 8.9. was:
Whether
to maintain a single commission or revert to the
organization decided upon at Cairo.
The
members of the commission were unanimous on the
fact that: the Communication as well as mobilisation
needs were huge; tasks linked to the
two respective components were extremely diversified
; requested experience and competence were
also diversified.
a) Huge needs
Mobilisation still constitutes a weak area with the ASF.
-
In fact participation/adherence
in/to the ASF movement must on the one hand be intensified
(increasing, but still poor African participation
in the WSF)
-
And on the other
hand, be diversified. Since its inception
until now, the ASF has been mobilising essentially
NGOs, or a certain category of SCOs
(Civil Society Organizations). The ASF must, on
the one hand, be extended to other social components,
and on the other hand, be balanced in terms of gender,
age and types of organizations of the so-called
“Civil Society”. It must aspire for added representativeness.
-
The mobilisation
should also be better articulated between
the various scales: local, national, sub-regional
and regional (or continental)
The
commission on “communication”, for
its part, comprises of several varying components.
-
Internal institutional
communication
(information
circulation is deficient within the ASF Council)
-
External institutional
communication
(propagate
the « Forum » event)
-
Communication as
a means of social mobilisation (amplification
and diversification of participation both in the
movement and in the event.
-
A means of promotion
and proliferation of the values that underlie the
Social Forums as well as the actions, initiatives
and struggles of the social movements.
b)
Tasks varying in nature
Mobilisation
and communication are transversal but do not collate:
it is difficult to mobilise without communication.
One can communicate without necessarily trying to
mobilise.
The
objectives and “targets” of communication
and mobilisation could equally be different. Their
“means” are also likely to be different:
in any case the media always represent a
common means.
c)
Different experiences and competences are
needed
This
issue gave rise an exchange in which the opinions
of the commission members were at variance.
Certain
members desired that the commission be divided into
two distinct commissions. Whereas, others desired
that Mobilisation, be transversal to all the other
commissions (mobilisation in favour of a strategy,
and with regard to contents; mobilisation of communicators;
mobilisation of resources). In this case, the Communication
and Mobilisation commission would need to concentrate
solely on communication, the strategy and tasks
of Mobilisation being incumbent on the Steering
Committee, which is now charged with identifying
someone for Mobilisation.
Outcomes
of the discussions:
The
members of the Communication and Mobilisation commission
finally agreed, for the time being, to stick to
only one commission.
They
however proposed to divide the C&M commission
into two sub-commissions.
2.
Nomination of a Representative of the C&M Commission
to the Steering Committee
The
criteria for this particular nomination had
been decided in Nairobi and later
improved on in the electronic discussion that ensued.
They were brought to mind, as follows:
1)
An effective adherence to the values
and the Charter of the WSF (Which goes without
saying… albeit…)
2)
Possess a certain competence in the area
being considered.
3) Have sufficient time availability for an active
participation within the Commission.
4)
Be in possession of minimal material facilities
(if possible, be in a position, provisionally or
occasionally, and autonomously, accomplish
certain material duties for the Secretariat (telephone,
etc.)
Certain
participants hoped to include the linguistic criterion
as an additional one: mastery of the two commonly
used languages of the ASFC. Finally, this criterion
was dropped. On the contrary, members of the C&M
commission requested that communication between
members of the ASFC be henceforth systematically
engaged both in French AND in English.
The
participants chose Diana
Senghor as the representative of the C&M Commission to the Steering Committee.
Nevertheless, having decided to set up two sub-commissions,
the participants requested that one of the other
two persons also be assigned to function within
the sub-commission(s).
|
Representative
of the C&M Commission: Diana Senghor
Representative
of the two sub-commissions of Mobilisation and
Communication: Rabia
Abdel Karim
and Thomas Deve.
|
3.
Plan of Action of the Commission
3.1.
Retrospect of the previous day’s session (7.9.05)
1.
Principles
-
The communication
must accord great priority to the media.
-
Alternative media
must be a target, but more priority must now be
given to dominant or official media, on the
international, as on the national scales. Television,
must particularly, equally be targeted.
-
The ASF media communication
must use existing African journalists
networks. The
role of “Flame of Africa” being central.
-
The ASF media communication
must also target international media as well
as the media of other continents, alternative
and dominant alike.
-
Communication does
not only evolve around on the media. It must also
take into account other forms of expression
(such as music, dance, films).
However, these forms of expression must they themselves
be given media focus (Concerts, caravans)
-
The national languages
commission must be privileged in guaranteeing the
“popular” aspect. National languages communication
between African speakers must be experimented.
2.
Plan of Action (The factors)
Communication
On what?
-
Communication on the Forums both as
a “moment” or as an “event”, and as a process.
-
Communication on events related to
Forums. Ex. :
Caravans, concerts, etc… (Promotion)
-
Communication on the African social
movements (Mobilisation)
How?
a)
Communication on the regional (continental) scale
"
Focal points could be identified and given responsibilities
at the sub-regional level
"
It will be the duty of these focal points to identify
and manage media
communication between the regions, at the continental
level so as to i) facilitate
communication between the different regions, weak
and surrounded by dominant international media;
ii) encourage and stimulate the production of information
by Africans on Africa, for the rest of the world.
"
Part of the CC responsibilities fall on the shoulders
of National organizing committee (BKO and
Nairobi)
b) Communication on (sub)-regional
scale
"
The duties of the sub-regional focal points could
be that of mobilising the media and the media networks
operating in their sub-regions as well as that of
facilitating information circulation within the
different countries of the (sub-) region concerned.
"
A certain priority should be given to the local media
producing and broadcasting in national languages, as
a means of reaching the public masses.
c)
Communication with the rest of the world: the international
scale
"
Facilitate the articulation of Africans journalists networks with alternative media networks in other
continents.
"
Target international media during coverage of Social
Forums taking place in Africa (Conakry,
Bamako in 2006;
Nairobi in 2007)
How?
"
Develop increasingly the use of ICTs
(Internet, satellite) for regional and international
communication.
"
A closer cooperation with the WSF Secretariat, and specifically,
by benefiting from the expertise and experience
of the Brazilians and Indians, who have organised
the previous WSFs.
3.2.
And after Perugia?
1.
The Plan of Action
should work on the Mobilisation component, which
was not elaborated on during plenary or commission
sessions.
2.
A Plan of Action
on Communication should develop the extra-media
component of communication.
3.
The Plan of Action
should (a) define, in a more specific manner, the
objectives (in particular of Mobilisation);
(b) the means and actions to be implemented;
(c) a timetable; It must also in addition
(d) assign responsibilities and (e) assess
the different resources (human, technical,
financial), necessary for its implementation.
4.
4°/ The articulation
between the role and tasks of the
ASFC Commission/those of the Communication Commissions
of the Organisation Committees of the WSF 06 (Bamako)
and WSF 07 (Nairobi)/those of the ASF Secretariat/those
of the International Communication Commission of
the ASF, must be specified.
5.
The members of the
commission should participate concretely
in the work of the Commission (They were delegated
to the two sub-commissions)
6.
The commission should
be extended/expanded/increased and strengthened
with new members, whose
contribution would be essential to
the finalisation and/or implementation of the Plan
of Action.
* *
|
ASF Council
Report of the Communication and Mobilisation Commission meeting
(Perugia, 8th September 2005)
|
I.
Participants
See
list available at the Secretariat
II.
Agenda
4.
Communication and/or
Mobilisation: one or two commissions?
5.
Nomination of a representative
of the commission to the Steering Committee of the
ASF Council
6.
A Plan of Action
III.
Discussion
1.
Communication and Mobilisation: a single commission
The
plenary session held on 7 September 2005 gave the “Communication
and Mobilisation” commission the mandate to propose
to the Council the organisation needed to carry
out the double task of both communication and mobilisation.
At
the Cairo meeting (July
2004), two different commissions, one on communication
and the other on mobilisation had been set up.
However,
the two commissions were somehow merged (halfway
between Cairo and
Perugia). The deliberations of the C&M commission that met on 7 September 2005 were mainly centred on Communication, much more than on mobilisation.
The
question raised on 8 September was:
Whether
to maintain a single commission or revert to the
organisation decided upon at Cairo.
The
members of the commission were unanimous on the
fact that: the Communication as well as mobilisation
needs were huge; tasks linked to the
two respective components were extremely diversified;
requested experience and competence were also diversified.
a) Huge needs
Mobilisation still constitutes a weak area with the ASF.
-
In fact participation/adherence
in/to the ASF movement must on the one hand be intensified
(increasing, but still poor African participation
in the WSF), and on the other hand, be diversified.
-
Since its inception
until now, the ASF has been mobilising essentially
NGOs, or a certain category of CSOs
(Civil Society Organizations). The ASF must, on
the one hand, be extended to other social components,
and on the other hand, be balanced in terms of gender,
age and types of organisations of the so-called
“Civil Society”. It must aspire for added representativeness.
-
The mobilisation
should also be better articulated between
the various scales: local, national, sub-regional
and regional (or continental)
The
commission on “communication”, for
its part, comprises of several varying components.
-
Internal institutional
communication ( dissemination of information is
deficient within the ASF Council)
-
External institutional
communication (propagate the « Forum »
event)
-
Communication as
a means of social mobilisation (amplification and
diversification of participation both in the movement
and in the event.
-
A means of promotion
and proliferation of the values that underlie the
Social Forums as well as the actions, initiatives
and struggles of the social movements.
b)
Different Tasks
Mobilisation
and communication are transversal but do not collate:
it is difficult to mobilise without communication.
One can communicate without necessarily trying to
mobilise.
The
objectives and “targets” of communication and mobilisation
could equally be different. Their “means” are
also likely to be different: in any case the media
always represent a common means.
c)
Different experiences and competences are
needed
This
issue gave rise to an exchange in which opinions
of commission members were at variance.
Certain
members desired that the commission should be divided
into two distinct commissions. Whereas, others desired
that Mobilisation, be transversal to all the other
commissions (mobilisation in favour of a strategy,
and with regard to contents; mobilisation of communicators;
mobilisation of resources). In this case, the Communication
and Mobilisation commission would need to concentrate
solely on communication, the strategy and tasks
of Mobilisation being incumbent on the Steering
Committee, which is now charged with identifying
someone for Mobilisation.
Outcomes
of the discussions:
Members
of the Communication and Mobilisation commission
finally agreed, for the time being, to stick to
only one commission.
They
however proposed to divide the C&M commission
into two sub-commissions.
2.
Nomination of a Representative of the C&M Commission
to the Steering Committee
The
criteria for this particular nomination had
been decided in Nairobi and later
improved on in the electronic discussion that ensued.
They were brought to mind, as follows:
1)
An effective adherence to the values
and the Charter of the WSF (Which goes without
saying… albeit…)
2)
Possess a certain competence in the area
being considered.
3) Have sufficient time availability for an active
participation within the Commission.
4)
Be in possession of minimal material facilities
(if possible, be in a position, provisionally or
occasionally, and autonomously, accomplish
certain material duties for the Secretariat (telephone,
etc.)
Certain
participants hoped to include the linguistic criterion
as an additional one: mastery of the two commonly
used languages of the ASFC. Finally, this criterion
was dropped. On the contrary, members of the C&M
commission requested that communication between
members of the ASFC be henceforth systematically
engaged both in French AND in English.
The
participants chose Diana
Senghor as the representative of the C&M Commission to the Steering Committee.
Nevertheless, having decided to set up two sub-commissions,
the participants requested that one of the other
two persons also be assigned to function within
the sub-commission(s).
|
Representative
of the C&M Commission: Diana Senghor
Representative
of the two sub-commissions of Mobilisation and
Communication: Rabia Abdel Karim
and Thomas Deve.
|
3.
Plan of Action of the Commission
3.1.
Retrospect of the previous day’s session (7.9.05)
1.
Principles
-
The communication
must accord great priority to the media.
-
Alternative media
must be a target, but more priority must now be
given to dominant or official media, on the international,
as on the national levels. Television must equally
be targeted.
-
The ASF media communication
must use existing African journalists’ networks.
The role of “Flame of Africa” being central.
-
The ASF media communication
must also target international media as well as
the media of other continents, alternative and dominant
alike.
-
Communication does
not only evolve around on the media. It must also
take into account other forms of expression (such
as music, dance, and films). However, these forms
of expression must be given media focus (Concerts,
caravans)
-
The national languages
commission must be privileged in guaranteeing the
“popular” aspect. National languages communication
between African speakers must be experimented.
2.
Plan of Action (The factors)
Communication
On what?
-
Communication on the Forums both as
a “moment” or as an “event”, and as a process.
-
Communication on events related to
Forums. Ex.:
Caravans, concerts, etc… (Promotion)
-
Communication on African social movements
(Mobilisation)
How?
a)
Communication at the regional (continental) level
"
Focal points could be identified and given responsibilities
at the sub-regional level
"
It will be the duty of these focal points to identify
and manage media
communication between the regions, at the continental
level so as to i) facilitate
communication between the different regions, weak
and surrounded by dominant international media;
ii) encourage and stimulate the production of information
by Africans on Africa, for the rest of the world.
"
Part of the CC responsibilities fall on the shoulders
of National organizing committee (Bamako and
Nairobi)
b)
Communication at the (sub)-regional level
"
The duties of the sub-regional focal points could
be that of mobilising the media and media networks
operating in their sub-regions as well as that of
facilitating the dissemination of information within
the different countries of the (sub-) region concerned.
"
A certain priority should be given to the local media
producing and broadcasting in national languages, as a means of reaching
the public masses.
c)
Communication with the rest of the world: the international
level
"
Facilitate the articulation of Africans journalists’
networks with alternative media networks in other
continents.
"
Target international media during coverage of Social
Forums taking place in Africa (Conakry,
Bamako in 2006;
Nairobi in 2007)
How?
"
Develop increasingly the use of ICTs
(Internet, satellite) for regional and international
communication.
"
A closer cooperation with the WSF Secretariat, and specifically,
by building on the expertise and experience of the
Brazilians and Indians, who organised the previous
WSFs.
3.2.
And after Perugia?
7.
The Plan of Action
should work on the Mobilisation component, which
was not elaborated on during plenary or commission
sessions.
8.
A Plan of Action on Communication should develop the
extra-media component of communication.
9.
The Plan of Action should (a) define, in a more specific
manner, the objectives (in particular of
Mobilisation); (b) the means and actions
to be implemented; (c) a timetable; It must
in addition (d) assign responsibilities and
(e) assess the different resources (human,
technical, financial), necessary for its implementation.
10.
The articulation
between the role and tasks of the
ASFC Commission/those of the Communication Commissions
of the Organisation Committees of the WSF 06 (Bamako)
and WSF 07 (Nairobi)/those of the ASF Secretariat/those
of the International Communication Commission of
the ASF, must be specified.
11.
Members of the commission should participate concretely
in the work of the Commission (They were delegated
to the two sub-commissions)
12.
The commission should be extended/expanded/increased
and strengthened with new members, whose
contribution would be essential to the finalisation
and/or implementation of the Plan of Action.
ANNEX
2: Report of the meeting on migrations
On course for World Social Forums in Africa in 2006 and 2007
Teamwork on migrations
Conference of 10 September in
Perugia, Italy
Participants
Bolini.Raphaëlla Bolni (Italy)
Solange Koné (Cote d'Ivoire)
Mohamed Saad Saadi (Morocco)
Abdeljelil Bédoui (Tunisia)
Buuba Diop
(Senegal)
Fofana Bakary (Guinea)
Aïssatou Foné (Mali )
M. Mamadou GOITA (Mali)
Demba Moussa Dembélé(Senegal)
Ousmane Abdourrahmane
(Niger)
Targeted Partners
-
WSF and ASF
-
Forums and other associations of migrants and refugees
-
African Union
-
European Union
-
ECOWAS
-
SADC
-
HCR
-
National Parliaments
-
Local Authorities
Introduction: Stakes, principles and methods
Participants acknowledged the interest of the
issue as well as the stakes: they have developed
initiatives on the issue and intend to intensify
and include them in their militant action.
Stakes are high and cover human, social, cultural,
political, economic, scientific and strategic aspects.
The move actually consists in development, solidarity,
human rights, cooperation and the respect of human
diversity.
- It will be fitting to build on
an original research from the most recent facts;
the gender approach shall be promoted as well. There
is a need to focus on the fate of workers, youths,
women, the elderly, families, and take an interest
in the migrations of labour forces, brain drain,
exclusions, but also cultural intermingling.
- The Group is a panel of facilitators;
its members shall be focal points in their respective
countries, regions and sub-regions
- The Group shall take the indications
of the commission into account; as well as the already
devised strategies and visions of ASF and WSF.
Thus, it will consider the concern of:
- Progressiveness (Conakry; Bamako; Nairobi)
- Articulation among the local, national,
sub-regional, regional and international levels
- Articulation between the past,
the present and the future
- Ensuring articulation between diagnosis,
resistance and alternative
- Long-term work
APPICATION
Thus, Cotonou (West African Forum) will be a platform
conducive for the continuation of the debates started
during the first West African Forum in
Conakry, Guinea on this theme.
- Conakry (4th African Social Forum
1-5 December 2005) will focus to African migrations
- Bamako (World Polycentric Social Forum)
will touch on migrations to Europe. This will be a more comprehensive stage of
information and construction (WSF of 2007)
- Nairobi will be devoted to international
migrations, with an emphasis on alternatives
CONTENTS
- Develop reflection on migrations
and enrich our forums
- Integrate identities, conflicts
in the search for peace and solidarity
- Denounce corruptions and mafias
- Combat reductionist
security visions and the logics of “subcontracting”
by countries of the South for those of the North
- Identify the new forms of dehumanisation
- Devise plans of action and projects
on this issue to step up solidarity; forge and/or
strengthen new civil consciences.
ACCOUNTABILITY
- Bakary and Solange
have been assigned responsibility for
Cotonou
- Bakary, Buuba
and Bédoui for
Conakry
- M Saadi and Aïssatou
Samaké for
Bamako
- Raphaëlla and Dembélé
for
Nairob
|